Introduce IDEA in a pilot setting and provide an opportunity for faculty members to receive training and feedback about their IDEA results.
In their teaching portfolios, faculty members include department and university norms (from Group Summary Reports) and national norms along with their own scores on Excellent Teacher and Excellent Course items. Review committees can help understand the relative performance of individuals when results are considered within the context of local and national information.
The Director of Faculty Development plots results for two summary measures (Progress on Relevant Objectives and Overall Excellence of Instructor) so that supervisors can see at a glance the scores of faculty who are in the top, middle, or bottom thirds.
IDEA results are only part of the evaluation process. Campuses also include peer/chair observations, alumni evaluations, student/faculty peer focus groups, syllabi and teaching material review. By reducing the emphasis on IDEA, instructors are free to examine their scores without fear being inappropriately penalized for less positive scores.
Providing feedback facilitates a more positive evaluation process.
Provides faculty an opportunity to see their IDEA results in a broader context and generates more thoughtful reflection.
Faculty are required to provide holistic summaries of their IDEA results. IDEA serves as the basis for reflective statements that are included in evaluation materials.
To keep the focus of using IDEA to guide improvement efforts, faculty members can determine if the results are included in their evaluation or promotion and tenure review materials.
New faculty members are evaluated in every course prior to applying for tenure. In the first semester, the Dean of Faculty Growth and Assessment will meet with new faculty to discuss the process of course evaluation and the IDEA form.
New department heads and deans are provided detailed information about how to use and interpret IDEA results.